 Dr. Brubaker
|
Hollywood, FL—Botulinum toxin A (Botox) is highly effective as a treatment for refractory urge incontinence symptoms in women with urodynamic
evidence of detrusor overactivity incontinence, but patients require assessment for transient urinary retention, according
to an investigator from Loyola University in Maywood, IL.
Injections of botulinum toxin A, 200 U, provided adequate symptom control for refractory urge incontinence symptoms in approximately
60% of women treated. Time to failure was at least greater than 6 months (>193 days), versus ≤62 days for those given placebo.
"In addition to adequate symptom control in 60% of participants, we also found significant improvement in quality of life
using validated measures," said Linda Brubaker, MD, professor of obstetrics/gynecology and urology at Loyola University Medical
Center. "The duration of efficacy is important to understand in terms of finding out the role of repeat injections and cost
effectiveness of a single injection."
Dr. Brubaker reported results of a randomized, 43-patient study at the American Urogynecologic Society annual scientific meeting
here. Twenty-eight patients received injections of botulinum toxin A; the remaining 15 were administered placebo. Women in the study had refractory urge incontinence with at least six urge incontinence episodes in a 3-day diary. They also
had documented detrusor overactivity incontinence in the preceding 12 months, and had experienced inadequate symptom control
after undergoing at least two previous types of therapy.
The primary outcome was time to failure, defined as a Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) score ≥4 ("inadequate
improvement") at least 2 months post-injection, or as the start/increase of any detrusor overactivity treatment at any point
following injection.
Concomitant retention halts Tx
At 193 days follow-up, 54% of patients had not met failure criteria. Significantly, though, 43% of botulinum toxin A-treated
subjects experienced urinary retention (which occurred only in the treatment group), and their injections were stopped.
"This was higher than previously reported in the literature," Dr. Brubaker said of the retention rate. "Perhaps this was because
we actually checked this in all patients, as opposed to seeing if they had the traditional symptoms of retention. One of the
most important findings in the study is that you cannot rely on the typical clinical symptoms of retention—you must check."
Dr. Brubaker defined retention as a post-void residual volume >200 mL regardless of symptoms at 4 weeks or catheterization.
Most urinary retention found (75%) was determined by post-void residuals.
Diary-documented episodes of incontinence decreased significantly at 1 month post-injection in the botulinum toxin A group,
from 17 to 3 for urge incontinence and from 21 to 4 for all types of incontinence. In contrast, decreases in the placebo cohort
were much less significant.
Post-injection assessment included a telephone call at approximately 7 days after injection and a monthly assessment consisting
of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, Patient Global Symptom Control, and a 3-day urinary diary during the first
month post-treatment only.
Dr. Brubaker is quick to note that this is still an off-label indication for botulinum toxin A, but high rates of efficacy
in European case series of neurogenic patients, as well as reported clinical experience in idiopathic patients, helped plant
the seeds for the trial.
"The botulinum injection is less frequent than a daily pill, which enhances compliance and, therefore, probably enhances symptom
control," Dr. Brubaker said. "But the risk of retention and cost are both potential disadvantages."
Injection techniques were standardized in the study, with 6 cc of the masked substance injected into 15 to 20 different detrusor
muscle sites under direct visualization, sparing the bladder trigone and ureteral orifices.
Allergan, Inc. supplied the botulinum toxin A for the study, but did not participate in its design, conduct, or analysis.
The investigation was undertaken for the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, whose work is funded by the National Institute of
Child Health and Human Development.