• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Vasectomy scrutinized in contraception, scope of practice campaigns



    Proposals requiring insurers to cover vasectomy



    Colorado (HB 1294)

    Alaska (HB 25)

    Illinois (New law)

    Hawaii (HB 1573)

    Maryland (New law)

    Minnesota (SF 409)

    Massachusetts (HB 948, SB 483)

    New York (AB 1378, SB 3668)

    Vermont (New law)

    Oregon (HB 2232)

    Colorado, Massachusetts, and New York lawmakers considered similar measures in 2016, but those campaigns ultimately collapsed. Undaunted, early in 2017, a member of the New York Assembly re-introduced the "Contraceptive Equity Act". According to the bill's sponsor, Assemblymember Kevin Cahill (D), the new law would build upon "existing state and federal law to promote gender equity.”

    As reported by the Associated Press, the health insurance industry warns against mandating comprehensive cost-free coverage. A senior vice president of the New York Health Plan Association is quoted as saying, "At a time when we are looking to ensure affordability, we shouldn’t be looking to add new requirements and new costs that would be borne by all premium payers."

    Insurers in four other states—Alaska, Hawaii, Minnesota, Oregon—are likewise lining up to oppose bills requiring that all plans sold in the state cover voluntary sterilization.

    Have you read - Update: States limit the role of specialty certification

    The Oregon legislature is considering proposals that would not only mandate cost-free coverage of male sterilization, but also give nurse practitioners the authority to perform the procedure. For several years, lobbyists representing women's health clinics across the state pushed for the expansion of nurse practitioners' scope of practice to specifically permit vasectomy. Representative Rob Nosse (D) introduced a bill in January 2017 that amends the politically sensitive sterilization law to exempt vasectomy from the list of procedures that a nurse practitioner may not perform.

    Supporters argue that a shortage of doctors has resulted in long wait times for the procedure.

    The Oregon Urological Society objected to an earlier version of the bill in a letter to the legislature's health committee. An article discussing the matter in the Portland Business Journal quoted Eugene Fuchs, MD, a urologist at Oregon Health and Science University. “Fuchs said vasectomies should be performed by someone with surgical training, which nurse practitioners lack. He said doctors don't even start training for vasectomies until two years into their residencies,” the article said.

    Read: Committee seeks to ban concurrent surgeries

    Past attempts to grant nurse practitioners this authority have fallen short, in part because lawmakers never received a study showing nurse practitioners would be as safe as physicians. Equally important in this case were the efforts of urologists, as individuals, and collectively as a society of professionals, to explain the practical implications of the proposal.

    Public regulatory actions that impact the urologic community must be carefully scrutinized by the physicians who specialize in the treatment of those conditions. Professional organizations, including the AACU, exist to alert and advise urologists when their unique voice will improve public policies. The AACU provides members with several opportunities to make their voices heard, including advocacy conferences such as the 12th Annual Urology Joint Advocacy Conference, scheduled for March 7-10, 2017, in Washington.

    More from Urology Times:

    BCG instillation: Why you can’t get reimbursed for catheters

    CMS data: Health care spending continues to rise

    Men's health: What you may have missed in 2016

    Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news source for urologists.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available