• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Study appears to refute obesity paradox in kidney cancer


    Did your study identify other risk factors for RCC or fatal RCC?

    We included a number of other known risk factors for kidney cancer apart from obesity. Hypertension is one that always comes out as being a significant risk factor. We included everything from hypertension to smoking to alcohol use, prior NSAID use, parity in women, alcohol use, exercise, and physical activity in a multivariable model to control for all these other potential causative factors of kidney cancer so we could really focus on the effect of obesity.

    How do you explain the difference in results from your study and studies showing the obesity paradox in kidney cancer?

    It gets down to how BMI is actually measured. The majority of these other studies that did find the obesity paradox measured BMI at the time of treatment, typically surgery, and when you do it that way you have one measurement.

    Also read: ‘Obesity paradox’ appears to fit for men with renal cell carcinoma

    I think what it comes down to is a combination of misclassification and selection bias, in which there are some patients who may have more advanced disease who may have lost weight, and subsequently, dropped down a BMI category. So you may have some patients in lower BMI categories who were enriched for more advanced disease, and it appeared that they had worse outcomes.

    The strength of our study is that we were able to look at average BMI over 30 to 40 years in a very large cohort, and we were able to look at that predicting the development of kidney cancer and fatal kidney cancer. When we did it that way, it was clear that you had about a 50% increase risk of developing kidney cancer and about a 90% increase of developing fatal kidney cancer if you had a BMI above 30. 

    What is your take-home message for urologists?

    You really need to be aware of the exposure when doing epidemiologic studies like this and not limit yourself to one measurement where there is the risk of bias or misclassification. I would be interested to know if those other studies have the potential to go back over time to see what the average BMI or a prior BMI measurement might have been to see if they still find that the obesity paradox is present.

    Recommended: Smoking raises risk of second smoking-related cancer

    I think that this study adds an important potential explanation that might explain the obesity paradox.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available