• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Single-use scope yields 45-min average surgery time

    Stone-free rates found comparable with reusable flexible ureteroscopes

     

    Reusable scopes linked with damage, repairs

    Carey et al reported damage during 8.1% of uses and the need for a new ureteroscope to be repaired after about 40 uses (J Urol 2006; 176:607-10). After a comprehensive repair, these new ureteroscopes averaged only 11 more uses before again needing repair.

    Semins et al (J Endourol 2009; 23:903-5) found that the cleaning and sterilization process can damage ureteroscopes. In their analysis, the average number of flexible ureteroscope uses before repair was 28, and the cost per use was $128 when amortizing repair costs.

    The clinical results of ureteroscopy using the new PUSEN digital single-use flexible ureteroscope were evaluated by Dr. Salvadó and co-investigators. The device has a 270-degree deflection on both sides, a 9F external diameter, and a working channel of 3.6F. The authors examined a prospective registry of consecutive cases performed by a single urologist using the new single-use ureteroscope between August and October 2016.

    Also see: Lipid metabolism linked to pediatric stone formation

    A total of 11 procedures with the single-use flexible ureteroscope was performed on eight male and three female patients. The average age of the overall group was 39 years. All the patients were treated using a 12F access sheath and holmium laser lithotripsy with a 260-µm fiber. The average stone size was 6 mm, with a range of 4 to 10 mm. Stone location was as follows: three in the proximal ureter, six in the renal pelvis, and two in the lower calix.

    The average total surgery time was 45 minutes, with a range of 25 to 85 minutes. The number of stones treated per patient varied from one to four. The mean fluoroscopy time was 50 seconds. Non-contrast computed tomography scan at 3 weeks showed the stone-free rates to be 100% in eight patients and 80% in three patients. One patient presented with a ureteral wall injury, with mucosal erosion at time of ureteral access sheath placement.

    The device behaved properly, with no loss in image quality or deflection capacity during the procedure, said Dr. Salvadó.

    More from Urology Times:

    Pain most common reason for post-URS ED visits

    Vibration therapy promising for treating stone fragments

    Gout patients at 60% greater risk for stone disease


    Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news source for urologists.

    0 Comments

    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available

    Poll

    View Results