• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    Severe pain after male sling implantation results in lawsuit

    Patient alleges physician had financial interest in product used for procedure


    Failure to remove fragment from penile implant

    A 53-year-old Arizona man sued his urologist for failing to remove a fragment of an old penile implant while he was performing surgery to replace the implant. The patient claimed the fragment caused him to develop an infection, which necessitated removal of the replacement implant. He alleged he will have erectile dysfunction for life as a result of the urologist’s negligence.

    Recommended: Telephone triage can jeopardize patient safety, lead to litigation

    The urologist denied the allegations and questioned whether the retained fragment was even left by him. The urologist’s infectious disease expert opined that the fragment did not cause the infection.

    The patient’s infectious disease expert stated that the fragment did in fact cause the infection. There were arguments on both sides as to whether the patient would be a candidate for a future penile implant. The jury returned a defense verdict.

    More from Urology Times:

    Missed kidney cancer diagnosis leads to death, legal action

    Circumcision requiring revision surgery prompts lawsuit

    How surgical time-outs may (or may not) lower litigation risk

    Subscribe to Urology Times to get monthly news from the leading news source for urologists.

    Dawn Collins, JD
    MS COLLINS is an attorney specializing in medical malpractice in Long Beach, California. She welcomes feedback on this column via ...


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available