• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    AUA, others continue blitz on USPSTF reform

    Proposed bill would require consultation with external experts

    Bob GattyBob GattyOne of the top remaining federal issues for urologists as Congress heads into full campaign mode is the effort to reform a federal entity that can virtually dictate whether various procedures are covered by federal health programs and, ultimately, by private insurers.

    That entity is the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), which in May 2012 recommended against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer. It was a decision that drew the ire of the AUA and other organizations within the specialty and prompted an all-out blitz on Congress to reform the way the USPSTF does business.

    The AUA and other organizations, since the instant of that recommendation, have been urging Congress to create transparency and accountability within the USPSTF while adding input and feedback from patients and specialists involved in treating the conditions for which it is developing recommendations.

    AUA backs USPSTF legislation

    Since that USPSTF ruling, Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) introduced the USPSTF Transparency and Accountability Act, which is strongly supported by the AUA and other urology groups. Co-sponsored in 2015 by Rep. Bobby Rush (D-IL), the bill includes a requirement that a “balanced representation of primary and specialty care providers” and other stakeholders in the health care community are involved in the development and review of USPSTF recommendations.

    Recommended - AACU on MACRA: Delay rollout, adjust low-volume threshold

    The Blackburn-Rush bill would require the USPSTF to:

    • publish a draft research plan (including analytic frameworks, key questions, and a literature search strategy, plus methodologic guidelines for the project) to guide the systematic evidence review process

    • consider findings and research by federal agencies and departments

    • make the evidence review available for public comment

    • coordinate activity with other federal government departments

    • consult with “external subject matter experts,” including provider and patient representatives.

    Now, of course, time has just about run out on the current Congress and new legislation will need to be introduced and fought for when the new Congress convenes in January—unless, by some miracle, supporters manage to get it passed during an expected lame-duck session following the election.

    With this in mind, USPSTF reform advocates are continuing their efforts on behalf of the reform legislation, working every conceivable angle and taking advantage of every opportunity.

    On July 12-13, nine AUA urologists joined members of the Alliance of Specialty Medicine at the annual Capitol Hill Advocacy Conference in Washington. Representing the AUA were Chris Gonzalez, MD, MBA; Jim Ulchaker, MD; Tom Rechtschaffen, MD; Jason Jameson, MD; Tim Averch, MD; Cary J. Stimson, MD, JD; Jim Dupree, MD, MPH; Kevin Koo, MD, MPH, MPhil; and Joshua Langston, MD.

    Read: Federal agencies consider telehealth, scope of practice proposals

    Members of both houses of Congress attended the 2-day session, which covered such topics as the proposed rule for the 2017 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule, physician payment reform, quality reporting, meaningful use, and an analysis of the federal elections.

    During the session, the AUA urologists visited Capitol Hill to advance sound health care policy and protecting patient access to care. They and other Alliance physicians urged reform of the USPSTF, and addressed other key issues of concern.

    “Since the Task Force’s controversial recommendation on PSA screening in 2012, the AUA has been working with a number of other like-minded provider and patient advocacy groups to raise awareness and increase support for more USPSTF transparency and accountability,” said Dr. Ulchaker, chair of the AUA’s Legislative Affairs Committee, in an AUA Policy and Advocacy Brief. “Now, with the Alliance’s backing, this will further illustrate to lawmakers how extensive their controversial recommendations have become.”

    Next: Dr. Penson meets with MedPAC

    Bob Gatty
    Bob Gatty, a former congressional aide, covers news from Washington for Urology Times.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available