• linkedin
  • Increase Font
  • Sharebar

    States take aim at health reform law from several fronts

    This article is part of an ongoing series from the American Association of Clinical Urologists (AACU), based on a partnership between the AACU and Urology Times. Articles are designed to provide monthly updates on federal and state legislative issues affecting urologists. We welcome your comments and suggestions about topics for future articles. Contact Ross Weber, state affairs manager, at 847-264-5924, or Joe Arite, government relations manager, at 847-517-1050 or

    Opposition to federal health reform approved by Congress and President Obama in March 2010 continues to find legal recognition in the states. Indeed, more than 40 states have taken varied actions to challenge the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    State constitutional amendments

    In 30 states, legislation called for constitutional amendments. The amendments typically call for the prohibition of an individual mandate to carry health insurance and are submitted to voters for approval. Arizona (6/09), Florida (4/10), and Oklahoma (5/10) approved such measures. In Colorado, a citizen’s initiative, Amendment 63, made its way to the November ballot. (In Florida, the proposed amendment was knocked off the ballot after the State Supreme Court deemed its language overtly political.)

    Federal constitutional amendment

    Idaho called for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution forbidding any law to require health care insurance. This was adopted by both Senate and House on March 29, 2010.

    State law

    At least 16 states proposed bills to amend the law, not the state constitution. These measures, successful in Virginia, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Missouri, and Utah, essentially state that no person should be required to carry health insurance. (In the case of Missouri, a law proposed by the legislature was submitted to voters and approved during its Aug. 3 primary election.)

    Executive and judicial branch legal action

    Attorneys general and/or governors in more than 20 states have taken actions to challenge the federal government’s constitutional authority to mandate certain elements of the health care reform law (see list below). Legal experts express varying opinions on the validity of this approach given the notion of federal supremacy over states’ authority. However, the federal government twice failed on separate motions to dismiss two lawsuits. In Virginia, a hearing on the merits of Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli’s case will be held Oct. 18. Oral arguments in the multi-state lawsuit led by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum are scheduled for Dec. 16.

    States challenging the federal government’s authority to mandate aspects of health reform














    North Dakota


    South Carolina

    South Dakota





    To learn more about legislative issues in your state, please visit AACU’s Action Center today at www.aacuweb.org.

    We also encourage you to post your comments about this topic in the “Post a Comment” box below.


    You must be signed in to leave a comment. Registering is fast and free!

    All comments must follow the ModernMedicine Network community rules and terms of use, and will be moderated. ModernMedicine reserves the right to use the comments we receive, in whole or in part,in any medium. See also the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Community FAQ.

    • No comments available